Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Jerome Robbins in high tech...

Hey all,
i thought you might find this interesting - it looks like a really interesting project in terms of how they're shooting it and then publicizing it online. Also, issues of ownership over choreography/artistic ideals? "Modernizing" our past? What do you think?

http://www.opusjazz.com/Watch/Documentary.html


Monday, November 26, 2007

The Reality of the Virtual


Today everybodys talking about virtual reality but I think frankly virtual reality is a rather miserable idea. It simply means let's reproduce in an artificial digital medium our experience of reality. I think that a much more interesting notion, crucial to understand what goes on today, is the opposite, not virtual reality but the reality of the virtual.
Slavoj Žižek


Thursday, November 22, 2007

Rosencrantz

We are programming automata in secret code.

Monday, November 19, 2007

The Society of Spectacle

The spectacle is not a collection of images, but a social relation mediated by images.
Guy Debord

text
film

Friday, November 16, 2007

Friday, November 9, 2007

phantom dancers.


I was really struck by the initial images of Forsythe’s work that were described in the reading. The use of shadow helps to distort the audience’s perception. Only parts of each dancer’s body can be seen. They are never whole. To me it almost seems as if the dancers are not really there at all and the audience is just creating this piece from their own memories. They are assembling flashes of body parts. They are not really certain about this memory which is why they cannot picture the dancer as a whole. They are trying hard to recall but cannot.
Why we are so interested in distorting the images that we see? I think that this ability that we have is incredible; the ability to change people’s perceptions. Easily, we get bored or in some way dissatisfied with the reality that we are given or with the way things are presented. So, what do we do? We mess around with it.

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

aka interactive tools


Masayuki Akamatsu of IAMAS has made these interface tools for Max freely available.

Items I am looking forward to using.
  • aka.appleremote ... handles the data of Apple Remote by deactivating Front Row.
  • aka.bookmotion ... retrieves the SMS (Sudden Motion Sensor) data.
  • aka.listen ... recognizes human spoken words through microphone input.
  • aka.speech ... reads aloud text.
  • aka.wiiremote ... handles Nintendo Wii Remote.
  • aka.iphone ... send/receive messages using iphone touchscreen interface


I need a wii controller and an iphone.

Monday, November 5, 2007

Blogs about blogs about blogs

Doug Fox of greatdance.com writes
How Can Dance-Tech Community Embrace the Internet?
on the dance-tech listserve
asking why we are the only dance tech class in the blogosphere
A map of the blogosphere

Graph Dance 1.0 to 2.0


Above is a video artifact from last year's version of the dance-grapher. Below is a written artifact to elaborate some of the ideas at work. Now that we are building the better/stronger/faster version of this machine it might be worth while to make sure you have wrapped your head around the project.

You should be able to
  • imagine state-space
  • understand still poses represent points in state-space
  • understand movement represents paths in state-space
  • understand a vocabulary of possible movement represents a surface in state-space
  • sketch a movement graph and "walk" all of its paths

Dance is a space craft and space is complex. Physics gives us powerful abstract representations of space that can be useful in this navigation. The trick is to exploit dimensionality.


Consider the simple one dimensional system, a bead on a wire. We can use one number to track its position. In a three bead system we would need 3 numbers. The state of this system could be represented by a single point in a 3-D space where the x,y and z coordinates correspond to the position of each bead. By extension the state of a 10 bead system could be represented as a single point in a 10-D space.



Many articulated systems are modeled this way, including proteins, robotic assemblies, and the human body. A human skeleton’s position, orientation and articulation is reasonably approximated by a single point in a 90 dimensional space.



Here is a graph representing the articulation of the leg in a cyclic motion. The 3-D state space is constructed using coordinate axes to mark hip, leg and foot angles.



Idea 1:
At any instant, the physical state of a body can be represented by a point in a high dimensional abstract space. This is a state space.

Muscular, gravitational, structural, environmental and inertial forces accelerate the body through different states. In dancing, the body freely navigates the continuum of states, and over time, carves an extrusion of them. Back in state space, this extrusion maps to a line of connected state points. This line points forward in time; it is directed. This line has no breaks, says Zeno, since moving from one state/point to another means passing through all the states/points in between.

Idea 2:
The changing of a body’s state carves a directed path in state space. Here dancing is a form of path making, a line of flight in space.

We use maps to navigate this space. The study of dance is a kind abstract cartography. Places in space are identified and named. Standing upright is a place and the name of that place is first position. Whenever I come to first position, or move through first position, I use it as a landmark to get my bearings. I know many paths that come to that place and many paths that leave from it. It is well mapped and has many crossings.

Idea 3:
Learning to move is a form of cartography. Identifying places in state space gives us the capacity to know where we are and where we can go. We drop breadcrumbs as we dance, and like Hansel and Gretel, hope to find these crumbs again so that we might make our way through the forest.

We all dance in the same abstract space and collaborate in its mapping. Since no one person can inhabit all parts of this space we expand our understanding of it by reading the maps of others. Dance is a space craft and we navigate it collectively.

Algorithm: Tony Schultz
Dancers: Hadar Ahuvia, Ashley Byler, I’Nasha Crockett, Jessica Long, Erin Reck, Sarah Richison, Sarah Rosner and Lily Susskind.
Music: “Diss Location” by High Alert Status

Sunday, November 4, 2007

What's your artifact and why is it an antique?

In looking at the pictures that sue posted (in particular the body as locus of memory) i was struck by the extents people have gone to find ways to memorize and retain information.

In Emily's improv class we've been working from the organ systems and their corresponding meridians. Again and again I am impressed and surprised by how often the path of a meridian or acupressure points are points or lines that multiple of us have been accessing and massaging nearly all of our lives to deal with very specific issues, all without a direct knowledge of what we were doing. It's amazing!

Compare that (and all these memory retaining techniques) to this idea that one of the greatest steps is human evolution was when we as humans began to write things down so we wouldn't have to remember them so we could in turn think more...and where does it take us? To me, it seems like it provides us with the benefit of having a colossal base of knowledge potentially available to us, with the drawback of a) becoming apathetic to the knowledge that isn't immediately presented to us and, b) becoming somewhat dependent on the ability to store everything we create (ideas, languages, paintings, dances) somewhere else.

So in my mind, that brings us to the present - where we are in some way, thinking too much and creating too much to be contained, and have a need hardwired into our system to put it somewhere else. Making dances with huge amounts of knowledge, material, process - whatever you want to call it (at this point i'm referring to the movement of a piece as the viscera, and any meaning/process/ideas/etc. as subviscera or "subvisc") is a complex process to say the least. However, our ways of containing and preserving dances have not evolved
at the rate that our hardwiring has...which brings us back to this problem of how to truthfully capture dance - what are our artifacts? antiques? notation systems? preservation modules? re-teaching methods? And more importantly, are they 100% exactly what we want them to be for us? Of course not. Let's get started, we have so much work to do!

артефакта, lost in transcription?

riffing off Rosner
and Tony
Matt Gough writes
http://quodlibet.tumblr.com/post/18339238

about:
  • preservation
  • artifact
  • cartography
  • writing
  • choreography

Saturday, November 3, 2007

Loci

Body as Memory LocusLanguage Architecture
Ramon Lull's Combinatoral Decoder Ring as a Mneumonic Device
Architectural/Mechanical/Linguistic Technology as Memory Device

Memory Space

Johannes Romberch's Memory LocusLeonardo's Vitruvian Man

Vitruvius' Roman Theatre

Reading Highlights

Choreography As a Cenotaph: The Memory of Movement by Gabriele Brandstetter


In dissecting a text, or a dance, sometimes it helps to start simply by recalling your favorite fragments. Since blue is my favorite color I will quote using it.

Forsythe's Limb's Theorem is described as "a theatre of the memory of movement"
pg 104

re: Rosner's interest in supplemental material
"The programme booklet is part of this choreographic theorem"
describing the booklet's graphs/graphics/geometries/incisions
"Choreography - as a sketching of paths, as cartography -is 'folded' into these pages."
pg 106

"As well as meaning 'extremity', the word 'limb' (deriving from the Latin limbus = 'hem' or 'edge') also designates the form of the circle and arc in instruments used for measuring and drafting angles."
Cartography - Notation and Memory of Movement
Palace of Knossos, Ariadne, labyrinth, thread, Daedalus, Minotaur
"All memory is spatial."
pg 108

Henri Bergson on image/movement
Domenico de Piacenza on image/movement (memoria and fantasma)
pg 110

mnemonotechnics
quoting Forsythe program "your kinesphere functions as a memory"
pg116

$entence
"The 'transhuman' re-embodiment of the moving body in cyberspace perhaps marks a further station in the instumentalisation process of cultural history, in the development of technologies which Michel de Certeau termed 'the apparatuses of incarnation'."
pg118

"As an everyday activity, walking becomes a patern of choreography as cartography: an act of describing paths of motion and their crossings; nothing less than a mapping"
pg120


Themes
choreography as graph making, map making, cartography
memory is spatial
body as locus for memory
memory involves the image/movement binary
dance and choreography in the mneumonotecnical matrix

Friday, November 2, 2007

Artifacts of Dance

Hey guys,
In doing the reading, i got especially interested in the discussion of making artifacts of dance.
Since i'm doing a thesis that focuses largely on that, it was (of course) extremly on my mind, but i found the way that it was discussed different from a lot of other things that i'd read.

Specifically, the idea that writing about a dance (or any other kind of translation/preservation) is a second type of "choreography" struck me as interesting, if not a little problematic. For me, it brought up issues of ballance between the original work and the preserving element. Should the element be invisible? Another work of art in it's own right? What is more helpful and "truthful" to the dance that's being preserved. And then, what's the best way to preserve dance? writing? video? motion capture? everything is problematic and there is clearly no right answer.

Anyways, that's just what jumped out at me.
How do all of you go about preserving your work? What seems most truthful to you?

food for thought

If we've been initiated into self-surveillance, can we ever really get out of that system/"the panopticon" . . . ?? What other behaviors do we automatically participate in once we are trained to practice self-surveillance? (the surveillance of others? comparisions of self to others or others to others? obedience to authority?)

Another question:

We talked about groups such as myspace and facebook and the illusion of being in the surveillance tower of one's own panopticon - that illusion of control, in a sense. Or that real control?

Well, those particular online communities have certain steps that you can take to ensure that only people you allow to look at you can see you and surveille your activity. What if someone is watching your online activity without your permission? How is this different from hidden cameras, phone taps, or someone following you around? How is it the same?

Thanks!